tg-me.com/bayan1122a/2149
Last Update:
BY حياة الروح💜😍♾
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/m2CLA327FDJAj33tVHdga5c_PGJfjioMyyiVVg9vsv9szmpmFUP-PoW6beoUGVaR8EqDRutaCqo0CQd316xzrSC2RpfRzqYzWkNO_MH_Z4Nu4y_jOKMGWdpxOfDSO0YBmbVPoxmOdpc_9Vz35SDXl6zHXJhbN-OKuA3onCzCvka0e4bvzlF2JRT6XJPM_ubu7XiFY-kGNfB5WGnlsxjdmI8R05br0pFVfUqRqhNS00OyGZ8ZrLmh3-jtT97w-q2MIC45R3M7JdINOFW7utMb09MSB-YvUrbiIdztuu6o36nsD62o3R05zgHiZ_vVxkHamNxEOJDUYrHQaOJUO0fehg.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/bayan1122a/2149
BY حياة الروح💜😍♾
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
حياة الروح from jp